home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.eunet.fi!fipnet!kone!jsaarinen
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- X-NewsReader: IntuiNews 1.2b (31.7.94)
- References: <38231862@kone.fipnet.fi> <4ctbmn$12h@dole.uninett.no>
- From: "Jyrki Saarinen" <jsaarinen@kone.fipnet.fi>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 16:53:37 UT
- Comments: Illegal date header - new date added by quicknews
- X-Original-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 96 18:25:29
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
- Subject: Re: CPU MHz in A1200+
- Message-ID: <38231955@kone.fipnet.fi>
-
-
- > If you are talking as-low-as-you-get- end machine your point
- > is valid, but I think most people would not hesitate too
- > much with a +$50 bill for a decent FPU.
-
- Where "most people" use the FPU?
-
- > Think of what software developers would have to say about
- > having a FPU as standard.
-
- What is the difference? Compiliers can produce FPU code
- or non-FPU code.
-
- -- _
- a Stellar programmer _ //
- "Amiga - back for the future" \X/
-